<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] GA chair's request about Individuals' Constituency
- To: <DannyYounger@cs.com>, <ga@dnso.org>
- Subject: [ga] GA chair's request about Individuals' Constituency
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 09:38:43 +0200
- Cc: <gcarey@carey.cl>, <aaus@MPAA.org>, <cchicoine@thompsoncoburn.com>, <Paul.Kane@reacto.com>, <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>, <kstubbs@dninet.net>, <vany@sdnp.org.pa>, <yjpark@myepark.com>, <mueller@syracuse.edu>, <greg_ruth@yahoo.com>, <tony.ar.holmes@bt.com>, <harris@cabase.org.ar>, <ck@nrm.se>, <Richard.Tindal@neulevel.biz>, <rcochetti@verisign.com>, <grant.forsyth@clear.co.nz>, <mcade@att.com>, <orobles@nic.mx>, <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>, <pdeblanc@usvi.net>
- Organization: AIM
- References: <44.1136ee18.289eccbc@cs.com>
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
Danny,
Thank you for widely posting your comments on an individuals
constituency. As you know new constituencies are a part of the NC business
plan and handled by the Review task force. That TF will be the conduit for a
recommendation to the NC on matters within its competence.
As a matter of procedure your request would best be
directed to the chair of the TF. As that is myself I will assume that request
has been made.
Please send me one document based on previous GA discussion
which outlines the rationale for an Individuals constituency together with
information on the level of support and dissent for the proposal. On receipt I
will table this for discussion with the task force.
Philip Sheppard
NC Chair
Chair review Task Force
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|