<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Re: Documentation request
- To: "'Philip Sheppard'" <philip.sheppard@aim.be>, <DannyYounger@cs.com>, <ga@dnso.org>
- Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Documentation request
- From: "Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:19:20 -0400
- Cc: <gcarey@carey.cl>, <aaus@MPAA.org>, <cchicoine@thompsoncoburn.com>, <Paul.Kane@reacto.com>, <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>, <kstubbs@dninet.net>, <vany@sdnp.org.pa>, <yjpark@myepark.com>, <mueller@syracuse.edu>, <greg_ruth@yahoo.com>, <tony.ar.holmes@bt.com>, <harris@cabase.org.ar>, <ck@nrm.se>, <Richard.Tindal@neulevel.biz>, <rcochetti@verisign.com>, <grant.forsyth@clear.co.nz>, <mcade@att.com>, <orobles@nic.mx>, <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <014201c11f19$eb6e4380$6501a8c0@aim.be>
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
Title: Message
Greetings:
Please
refer to Article 3, and section 3 (d) of the ICANN bylaws at
The
(proposed) new constituency must self-organize, probably produce a document
containing at least a statement of purpose, or mission statement, and some basic
bylaws defining membership.
Once
the (proposed) new constituency has self-organized, it may petition the Board
for recognition.
My
question is, has such self-organization, and production of documents taken
place?
Peter
de Blanc
(Please note that I support the idea of some kind of individual domain
name holder's constituency)
Danny,
thank you for your reply to my request for a
document summarising the rationale and level of support for an individual's
constituency. I can understand your temptation in continuing to copy in the
entire NC but would urge you to stop unless those individuals actively ask to
be kept directly informed. A copy to nc-review would seem more
appropriate.
You cited general references to the CONCEPT in the
report of WG review with which I am familiar. You
also cite a proposal on the CONCEPT made by Karl Auerbach. Did this ever
get to a vote? You also cite various votes to questions of CONCEPT in
each case with votes cast numbering from around 20 to 90
persons.
What would be useful is to know if there has been a
SUBSTANTIVE proposal addressing the key issue of representation, and if so
what level of support that proposal received.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|