RE: [ga] Re: Documentation request

["Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>]

Joop:

Yes, I did know about this. Of course, I was not a member of the NC at
the time.  And Joanna, thank you for the links.

My question is, as of today, is there a document that all interested
parties have formed (rough) consensus on, that constitutes the current
"submission to the NC" for endorsement/recommendation to the board?
This document, of course, would be the one submitted to the board for
recognition of the new constituency.

If so, what is the URL of that document, and where is a list of those
persons supporting it.

BTW- I'll be happy to add my name to that list !

Peter de Blanc


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Joop
Teernstra
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 8:42 PM
To: Peter de Blanc; ga@dnso.org
Cc: 'Philip Sheppard'
Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Documentation request


At 09:19 7/08/01 -0400, Peter de Blanc wrote:

>My question is, has such self-organization, and production of documents
>taken place?
>
Peter and Ken,

The answer to that is Yes.
  Long before the WG-review  convened, the members of the Cyberspace 
Association agreed on a constitution that contains a mission statement
and 
rules of self-organization.

See www.idno.org/organiz.htm

This has come about amidst much public debate, public enough to often
spill 
over to the GA list.

I am surprised that you did not know about this, of if you did, why you 
thought that this effort should be ignored.


--Joop--
the Cyberspace Association.
(www.idno.org)


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html