Re: GA Chair election mechanism - Was: [ga] Review Task Force List ...

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear Roberto,
let me review quickly your last three mails:

- I fully agree with your points on the election of the Chair by the GA. 
You must understand it would transfer de facto the authority of the DNSO 
from  NC to GA if a new ballance is not found with the "Constituencies" 
becoming far more active on the GA, open and transparent.

- as I quickly documented it in my response to Danny's questions, 
"consensus" has either a clear definition which is "no disagreement" or - 
and this is the way we use it -  it is the "community correct" of the me/we 
model. This is a consensus by the soft exclusion of the people who disagree.

- let not spend time to set-up rules for the DNSO and let focus on the DNSO 
itself. Electing its  Chair, ALSC propositions, Registrants and Internet 
User being represented are changes complex to  accomodate. You may also 
remember that the WG-R identified the constituency system as the root of 
the DNSO problems.

Jefsey


On 12:53 11/08/01, Roberto Gaetano said:
>Joanna,
>
>>A resounding apology. The first part of this message was intended ...
>
>No need to apologize - it was a misunderstanding.
>
>If we are mostly in agreement, maybe it is time to define a common 
>position that I can present to the Task Force.
>
>The position shall include, IMHO:
>- the statement that the GA should elect its Chair;
>- provide the rationale for it (self-governance, for instance);
>- observe that the GA currently elects other officials (like 
>representatives to Task Forces, for instance) without any intervention of 
>the NC, and the whole thing works well;
>- provide evidence of the previous positions of the GA (and other bodies, 
>like WGs).
>
>Please be aware that the last point is less than trivial: as there may be 
>no time to vote, I should provide evidence that I do have mandate from the 
>GA to express this position. I would appreciate your contribution in 
>providing urls for the WG consensus calls and other messages you may think 
>are relevant (private mail are good enough if you don't want to "waste a 
>post").
>
>Best regards
>Roberto
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html