<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [ga] Re: Documentation request
Also, the ICANN will probably not consider a public consensus valid.
Their behavior shows they have never achieved this nor do they act as if it
is an acceptable way to do business.
We need to develop a strong solution and sell it directly to the US
Congress so they can force the ICANN to do their job.
:)
~k
At 07:13 PM 8/13/2001 +0000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>Milton Mueller wrote:
>>
>>Peter:
>>The self-organization took place back in Spring 1999.
>>An IDNO organization has been around since then, the
>>powers that be just didn't like the people behind it.
>>Can we agree that when _another_ such proposal comes
>>before the NC that it will be treated less politically?
>
>I don't know about "the powers that be", but speaking for myself I don't
>have problems with the "people" behind the proposal as individuals, but
>with their lack of representativity of the population they claim to speak
>for, together with the lack of capability to aggregate new forces and new
>subjects.
>You rightfully mention that the proposal has been floating around for 2+
>years, and in fact the numbers behind it have not grown substantially.
>
>Until we are not able to present a proposal that can have the support of a
>substantially higher population (by involving consumer organizations, user
>groups, other individuals) "the powers that be" will have at least a good
>excuse for not recognizing the constituency.
>
>Regards
>Roberto
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|