ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Re: Documentation request


interesting conclusion ..

one previous formal submission  ? one rejection ?  (roberto previously
outlined reason for rejection)

interesting play on words leah....... i guess the singular "one" could be
interpreted as "every" (but frankly..... it's  a bit of a stretch )

i am still waiting for concrete "proposals" and all i see here is on this
list   "unstructured discussion"

its too bad that all the energy that has been put into complaining hasn't
been applied  more constructively into preparation of a concrete proposal
for submission

ken stubbs









> Peter,
>
> Given a chance, there would be thousands of members.  However,
> since the BoD and NC have shot down every attempt at formation,
> people are now reluctant to do much until there is an indication
> that the Board will, in fact, approve one.

>
> On 14 Aug 2001, at 16:25, Peter de Blanc wrote:
>
> > Milton,
> >
> > Regardless of your comments about number of ccTLD's participating,
> > that has little to do with what I said.
> >
> > When I said "100", I said persons or organizations signing off on a
> > document. Surely you have 100 persons to represent an IDNH
> > constituency. You should have thousands!
> >
> > Peter de Blanc
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org] On Behalf Of
> > Elisabeth Porteneuve
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:00 AM
> > To: Mueller@syr.edu; ga@dnso.org; pdeblanc@usvi.net
> > Cc: DannyYounger@cs.com; philip.sheppard@aim.be
> > Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Documentation request
> >
> >
> >
> > "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > Are there more than 100 organizations actively represented in the
> > > ccTLD constituency?
> > >
> > > (We both know the answer is no - about 30
> > > actually participate).
> >
> > ==> You are icorrect Milton.
> >
> >     We had 95 ccTLD Registries contributing to ICANN (sending money,
> >               more than 1 million USD, all from foreign countries)
> >     We had 98 ccTLD Registries voting in our elections
> >     We had 70 ccTLD Registries physically represented at Geneva
> >     meeting
> >               last February
> >
> >     If you consider in domain names or in population of countries from
> >     which ccTLD Registries come, and which Local Internet Communities
> >     they represent sometimes, the active participation is
> >     approximately 99 percent.
> >
> >     Elisabeth Porteneuve
> >     ccTLD NC rep
> >
> > >
> > > >>> "Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net> 08/13/01 07:12PM >>>
> > > If and when a set of documents to form the idho, or whatever it
> > > evolves to be called, with aa significant number of persons and
> > > organizations signing off on it (more than 100) I would endorse it
> > > for
> >
> > > presentation to the ICANN board.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> >
>
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>