RE: [ga] Re: Documentation request

["Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net>]

Leah, and all

I am getting really tired of this rhetoric. Most board members and NC
members I know support the idea of IDNH constituency.

Peter de Blanc

-----Original Message-----
From: L Gallegos [mailto:jandl@jandl.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 4:45 PM
To: Peter de Blanc
Cc: ga@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Documentation request


Peter, 

Given a chance, there would be thousands of members.  However, 
since the BoD and NC have shot down every attempt at formation, 
people are now reluctant to do much until there is an indication 
that the Board will, in fact, approve one.  There has been no such 
indication and the chicen and egg routine continues.

It appears rather obvious that it is a similar attitude as that 
regarding the at-large.  The BoD doesn't want that "for real" 
participation and has put as many stumbling blocks as possible in 
its way.  The IDNHC is even worse.  Even with self formation it has 
been shot down time after time.  The climate is one of 
discouragement.

IMO, the NC should fully endorse the formation of this constituency 
and then people would set out to self form again.

Leah


On 14 Aug 2001, at 16:25, Peter de Blanc wrote:

> Milton,
> 
> Regardless of your comments about number of ccTLD's participating, 
> that has little to do with what I said.
> 
> When I said "100", I said persons or organizations signing off on a 
> document. Surely you have 100 persons to represent an IDNH 
> constituency. You should have thousands!
> 
> Peter de Blanc
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ga@dnso.org [mailto:owner-ga@dnso.org] On Behalf Of 
> Elisabeth Porteneuve
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:00 AM
> To: Mueller@syr.edu; ga@dnso.org; pdeblanc@usvi.net
> Cc: DannyYounger@cs.com; philip.sheppard@aim.be
> Subject: RE: [ga] Re: Documentation request
> 
> 
> 
> "Milton Mueller" <Mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > Are there more than 100 organizations actively represented in the 
> > ccTLD constituency?
> > 
> > (We both know the answer is no - about 30
> > actually participate).
> 
> ==> You are icorrect Milton.
> 
>     We had 95 ccTLD Registries contributing to ICANN (sending money,
>               more than 1 million USD, all from foreign countries)
>     We had 98 ccTLD Registries voting in our elections
>     We had 70 ccTLD Registries physically represented at Geneva
>     meeting
>               last February
> 
>     If you consider in domain names or in population of countries from
>     which ccTLD Registries come, and which Local Internet Communities
>     they represent sometimes, the active participation is
>     approximately 99 percent.
> 
>     Elisabeth Porteneuve
>     ccTLD NC rep
> 
> > 
> > >>> "Peter de Blanc" <pdeblanc@usvi.net> 08/13/01 07:12PM >>>
> > If and when a set of documents to form the idho, or whatever it 
> > evolves to be called, with aa significant number of persons and 
> > organizations signing off on it (more than 100) I would endorse it 
> > for
> 
> > presentation to the ICANN board.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list. Send mail 
> > to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe ("unsubscribe ga" in the body 
> > of the message). Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list. Send 
> mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe ("unsubscribe ga-full" in 
> the body of the message). Archives at 
> http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html