[ga] Re: Documentation request

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>]

if you want to be pessimistic here danny the let me propose another
scenario...

this is supposed to be a "self-organizing" , "bottoms-up"  process and if
the "criteria" your talking about was developed in the manner you prescribe
(i.e. my my associates and myself).. we would almost undoubtedly encounter
indignation on the part of potential "self organizers" over the fact that
some sort of "criteria" or "structure" was being "imposed" on them..

the other 7 constituencies "self organized", developed consensus, and
"reached out" for potential fellow constituents. that way they got what they
wanted in an organizational structure and eligibility criteria.. none of
that  was " imposed" ..

sum & substance.....

bring the NC & the board something with "substance & support" and i will
help make it fly... i have made this committment publicly now for well over
a year & a half ...





----- Original Message -----
From: <DannyYounger@cs.com>
To: <ga@dnso.org>
Cc: <kstubbs@digitel.net>
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: Documentation request


> Ken Stubbs is looking for a "concrete proposal".
>
> I would be willing to bet that if a concrete proposal was submitted to the
> Board today, the only response that we would receive would be:
>
> "Whereas the ICANN Board is in receipt of a proposal regarding the
> establishment of a new DNSO constituency;
> Whereas the Names Council has been notified that the ICANN Board expects
to
> receive a bottom-up community-based consensus proposal regarding criteria
> governing the establishment of new constituencies;
> Whereas the Board is not in receipt of such proposal from the Names
Council;
> It is hereby resolved that no action on this matter is to be taken at this
> time."
>
> Perhaps Ken can motivate his associates on the Council to finish drafting
> such criteria before Montevideo.  If they can commit to finishing this
> project by then (the Council Business Plan, after all, was drafted back in
> February), then I am sure that our motivated members can have a concrete
> proposal ready.
>
> If we all cooperate we can get this job done.  Ken, are you willing to
take
> the lead on this in the Council?  Can you settle the issue of "criteria",
so
> that any concrete proposal may be examined in light of this "criteria"?
We
> are awaiting the efforts of the Council.  Can we count on your support to
> have the Council complete its work in a timely fashion?
>

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html