<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Re: Documentation request
At 03:42 15/08/01, Kent Crispin wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:28:41AM -0700, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> > Denying a proposal because one doesn't like the people supporting it is not
> > politics of any honorable variety. It is slimey, subjective, and personal.
> > It also doesn't serve the best interests of the ICANN, in the long run.
>
>It's interesting how you take Miltons characteristically inaccurate and
>insulting statement and run with it.
>
>The "powers that be" may or may not like the personalities involved, but
>the FACT is that the "cyberspace association" (aka as the "IDNO") simply
>does not credibly represent those that it claims to represent. That is
>a completely sufficient grounds for rejecting it. In fact, it would have
>been totally irresponsible for the Board to do otherwise.
The Board has not made it clear whose advise they have taken to judge the
credibility of the IDNO membership signup process.
If anything was lacking, improvements could have been suggested by those
advisors.
But because they did not reject the petition for recognition at any stage,
they were spared the need to suggest anything. Smart. But "totally"
responsible (in the sense of answerable)??
If you allege as FACT that something is "simply" the case, Mr Crispin, it
should be simple for you to point out why.
You are on record to have disputed the need for a declaration of adhesion.
You wanted to be listed as a member while promoting the opinion that there
was no need for an Individuals Constituency in the DNSO.
Logically, the adherence to a Mission Statement as a condition for
successful signup as a member makes it *more* credible that those who sign
up wish to be represented by the organization, its charter and its mission
statement.
-joop
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|