[ga] Re: Documentation request

[DannyYounger@cs.com]

Ken,

Pardon me if I sounded at all pessimistic.  I do believe that you can 
spearhead this effort in the Council, and only seek to remind you of the 
explicit language of the Business Plan to which the Council has committed 
itself:

The original language stated the following:
5.4 Individuals Constituency. Review the need, uniqueness, potential 
contribution and representiveness of an individual domain name holder's 
constituency.
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-plan/Arc00/doc00003.doc

This language was then modified by Erica:
5.4 New Constituencies: Review and clarify process for creation of new 
constituencies
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-plan/Arc00/doc00004.doc

The change in wording was acceptable to your Chair:
"Erica, thanks for your insight. I support both your changes.  Philip."
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-plan/Arc00/msg00016.html

The Business Plan was then ratified at the Melbourne session.

As the Council has already made the decision to "clarify the process", we are 
waiting for the Council to get its job done.
 
Quoting Erica:  "I believe it is more important for us to focus on the 
process issue than on the specific question of whether an Individual 
Constituency should be established.  Once the process is clarified, then it 
is clear what hoops any group (including those who wish to establish an 
individuals constituency) will have to jump thru in order to get recognition."
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-plan/Arc00/msg00015.html

If you can facilitate this "clarification", we will offer you all necessary 
support.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html