Re: [ga] Net-block issues

[William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>]

Registries should not be involved in MAPS like operations at all.

You can't seriously be suggesting that?

MAPS is not a functionality, it is a disfunctionality, and if it is to
exist at all, it should be managed privately.

Wednesday, Wednesday, August 15, 2001, 8:38:35 AM, Roeland Meyer wrote:
> The fundimental process disconnect here is that, IMHO, the various
> registries should be performing the MAPS function as part of their policy
> enforcement mechanism. This is not written into any of the
> registrar/registry agreements.

> If anything argues for a centralised systems approach, the MAPS
> functionality does. IMHO, this makes it an ICANN issue. Yes, this also
> politicizes it somewhat. No, some NANOG denizens won't like it and that is
> guaranteed.




-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html