RE: [ga] Re: Documentation request

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

Let's be careful to avoid even accidently, mission creep.

For example, I don't see any role for ICANN in operating systems or
software...at all.  


-----Original Message-----
From: Jefsey Morfin [mailto:jefsey@wanadoo.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 9:31 AM
To: ga@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [ga] Re: Documentation request


Bravo. I wished you would accept being a candidate.
The IP issue is very important and totally neglected.
As is the IPv6 implementation which may lead to a
total blocking of the network - over routing updates
and information transfers - if not coordinated with every
kind of existing and foreseeable stakeholders. And
there are legion from banks to WebTV, Govs to
Health Care, Telcos to lotteries, Polices to consumer
organizations, etc... etc...

DN is small fun when compared with IP issues.
IP ICANN policy is documented by ICP-none.

Jefsey


On 10:58 15/08/01, Elisabeth Porteneuve said:
>     I do believe it makes much more sense if the Mission Statement
>     of Individuals organization within ICANN, which is still
>     to be devised, could focus on preserving the possibility
>     to Individuals to be both on the Internet, producer and consumer.
>     To well describe what are fundamentals to that (IP number
>     and domain name, but also freedom of choice of operating system
>     and softwares for PC of Individuals).
>     It implies subsequently to consider responsibilities and duties
>     of everybody.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html