<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[ga] RE: NC Proposal for an Individuals' Constituency
- To: "'DannyYounger@cs.com'" <DannyYounger@cs.com>, ga@dnso.org
- Subject: [ga] RE: NC Proposal for an Individuals' Constituency
- From: "Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 17:33:52 -0500
- Cc: gcarey@carey.cl, aaus@MPAA.org, "Chicoine, Caroline G." <CCHICOINE@thompsoncoburn.com>, Paul.Kane@reacto.com, erica.roberts@bigpond.com, kstubbs@dninet.net, vany@sdnp.org.pa, yjpark@myepark.com, mueller@syracuse.edu, greg_ruth@yahoo.com, tony.ar.holmes@bt.com, harris@cabase.org.ar, ck@nrm.se, Richard.Tindal@neulevel.biz, rcochetti@verisign.com, grant.forsyth@clear.co.nz, mcade@att.com, philip.sheppard@aim.be, orobles@nic.mx, Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr, pdeblanc@usvi.net
- Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org
Danny, this is being put on the IPC's agenda for their pre-Montevido meeting
in Buenes Aires, so the IPC President will report the results of the
discussion to the GA in Montevido.
-----Original Message-----
From: DannyYounger@cs.com [mailto:DannyYounger@cs.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 11:22 AM
To: ga@dnso.org
Cc: gcarey@carey.cl; aaus@mpaa.org; cchicoine@thompsoncoburn.com;
Paul.Kane@reacto.com; erica.roberts@bigpond.com; kstubbs@dninet.net;
vany@sdnp.org.pa; yjpark@myepark.com; mueller@syracuse.edu;
greg_ruth@yahoo.com; tony.ar.holmes@bt.com; harris@cabase.org.ar; ck@nrm.se;
Richard.Tindal@neulevel.biz; rcochetti@verisign.com;
grant.forsyth@clear.co.nz; mcade@att.com; philip.sheppard@aim.be;
orobles@nic.mx; Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr; pdeblanc@usvi.net
Subject: NC Proposal for an Individuals' Constituency
Dear Names Council representative,
This is a reminder that the General Assembly has already resolved to express
its support for the immediate acknowledgement of an Individuals'
Constituency. This sentiment has been expressed over and over again, and we
are waiting for the Council to take action.
The ICANN Board in Stockholm declared, "Proposal should come through the NC.
We would entertain any reasonable proposal in accordance with Bylaws."
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/stockholm/archive/scribe-bod-060401.html
The preliminary agenda for the 9 September Public Forum requires the Names
Council to report on status of DNSO review. We are expecting you to have a
proposal ready which will allow for the creation of such a constituency.
This should be your highest priority, and we have waited far too long
already.
At this time we are asking you to declare whether you (on behalf of your
respective constituency) will support this goal and quickly see it through
to
fruition.
We look forward to your reply on this matter.
Best regards,
Danny Younger
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|