ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Webcast of Today's NC Meeting


Dear Marilyn,

On a point of clarification, during yesterday's teleconference, I understood
you to say that you would be contacting Board Candidates with a view to
arranging a Teleconference with the BC, and/or submitting written questions
in due course. If that is correct, when might we expect this to be
forthcoming? 

I am also attaching a copy of a related post, just posted to the GA list,
which is self explanatory, and should also have been copied to my fellow
candidates.

Regards,
Joanna


on 8/17/01 12:04 PM, Joanna Lane at jo-uk@rcn.com wrote:

> Dear Peter,
> 
> During the NC's extensive deliberations yesterday on the Board Director
> election, you, as a representative of the ccTLD Constituency, set the
> criteria that any candidate running for this job should who be willing to
> attend Montevideo and meet with the Constituencies face to face. As a direct
> result of your astute arguments, the first round of vote cast on the
> election was deferred until Saturday 8th September, decided by a clear
> majority of the NC. If I understand you correctly, you then indicated that
> if the reason for non-attendance was financial, then transportation could be
> provided for candidates, but that a willingness to attend was essential. Let
> me make a clear statement that I am willing to attend.
> 
> Notwithstanding the fact that I have not received any invitations to
> participate in any Constituency meetings in Montevideo, I am eager to do so,
> and more than happy to make the effort to comply with your requirement of
> me. I do fully appreciate your concerns, and understand the particular
> difficulties of using written questions, or teleconferences when liaising
> with a diverse and multi-lingual membership. Prior to your statement, I saw
> good, but not vital, reasons for my attendance. Subsequent to your statement
> and the supporting vote of other NC members, it is obvious that any
> candidate who does not attend will lose this election.
> 
> While not wishing to add to your burdens, and in order to not unfairly
> disadvantage any of my fellow candidates, I am therefore requesting that you
> make whatever ground, air and lodging arrangements may be necessary for all
> of us to attend Montevideo.
> 
> My own position is this. I have family visiting from Europe until the 4th,
> but could leave on the 5th/6th, which would allow me to attend the ccTLD
> constituency meeting on the 7th at 2pm, or at your members convenience,
> another time.
> 
> Regarding other Constituencies, at the time of writing, I have participated
> in a 90 minute teleconference with the IPC, and submitted responses to
> written questions posed off-list by the gTLD. I can only assume that any
> other constituency requirements will be forthcoming, including the BC, from
> whom I have not yet heard.
> 
> Regards,
> Joanna 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>