RE: [ga] Funding of ICANN Board candidate travel expenses

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

The point is that there has been small local participation in such things.
Coming down from the SF Bay Area, for MdR, I spent over $3000. Analysis of
Stockholm forcated expenses yields a similar number. My larger issue is loss
of 1.5 weeks of billing, a constant for all ICANN meetings, with very
little/none probable effect on new business or positive effect on revenue.
JavaOne was more beneficial to MHSC core business then MdR, or any other
ICANN meeting.

|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: Roberto Gaetano [mailto:ga_list@hotmail.com]
|> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 8:25 AM
|> 
|> Jefsey,
|> >
|> >I would be really interested if we added all the travel 
|> expenses by ICANN
|> >meeting attendees over one year and compared with what they 
|> would have been
|> >should all the meetings have been held in MdR.
|> 
|> I understand that for you MdR could be more convenient, but 
|> probably most 
|> Uruguayans would find Montevideo less expensive....
|> Roberto
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html