[ga] Status of the Review Task Force

["Roberto Gaetano" <ga_list@hotmail.com>]

Hi.

It was my intention to post a message to communicate my frustration for the 
lack of progress of the Review Task Force, which indicates, IMHO, the lack 
of willingness and/or capability by the DNSO to proactively reform itself.
Then I read the pending messages, and in particular the different documents 
related to AtLarge studies. These support "de facto" the 
Individual/Registrants proposal and implicitely identify problems in the 
current DNSO.
I am now wondering whether the Task Force itself is not overcome by events. 
Why argue on the criteria for the creation of a Constituency within this 
DNSO when the alternative can be a role in a different SO?

I think that this should be a central point in the next days, 
pre-Montevideo. What do GA members think? Does the idea of an ALSO obsolesce 
the request for an IDNH Constituency?

Regards
Roberto


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html