Re: [ga] Status of the Review Task Force

["L Gallegos" <jandl@jandl.com>]

On 30 Aug 2001, at 7:38, DPF wrote:

> On Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:11:09 +0200, Thomas Roessler
> <roessler@does-not-exist.org> wrote:
> 
> >Thus, if the DNSO stays like it is, an IDNHC should be established.
> >However, if it's broken up, and the issue-based SO model is
> >abolished, an IDNHC's role would in fact be taken by the ALSO.
> 
> Agreed.  If the DNSO loses responsibility for domain name policy then
> the proposed ALSO may suffice.

I thought that DNSO stood for DOMAIN NAME SUPPORTING 
ORGANIZATION.  How in the world can that be transformed so that 
it no longer has responsibility for domain name policy?  
Restructuring it so that it is more fairly distributed doesn't mean 
destroying it.  It certainly does not make it less imperative to 
include individual domain name holders.

Leah

> 
> DPF
> --
> david@farrar.com
> ICQ 29964527
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html