Re: [ga] Status of the Review Task Force

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

On 09:23 30/08/01, Roberto Gaetano said:
>Of course, it will be in the best interest of the wannabe constituency to 
>produce more and better evidence to better build their case, but it should 
>not be a requirement for the DNSO to open a debate and a vote in the NC).

Full agreement here. Creating a new constituency is BoD privilege. NC has 
nothing to do here. But the new constituency mist be formed enough for the 
BoD just to acknowledge it exists and to maintain good relations already 
with the other constituencies. Actually is should be a no one 
decide/everyone approve situation.

Should the GA have existed and Joop having started the IDNO as a de facto 
part of the GA, the problem would be solved for a long.

Jefsey

PS. The change in DNSO will be the abandon of Dennis Jennings compromise. 
We all know that for a long and it should have been WG-Review 's main task 
to address the way of doing it. This now question the raison d'être of the 
BC and of the NCDNHC. They must switch quickly to the ALSO since the rigid 
SO system oblige them to belong to a single SO. This rigid SO system also 
creates a totally artificial problem to the ccTLDs. Mike is right about the 
need of a gTLDSO. Another solution would be to adopt directly my scheme 
instead of promoting progressively every constituency to SO level, making 
the BoD a super NC until the SO start forming WG with their own Council and GA.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html