Re: [ga] Nine Geographical Zones

[Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr>]

Actually, it would be essential to have stats on participation
(people who write to the ga list) from current geographic regions
or better by countries.
I see there is no such information provided in ALSC report.

I am very much in favour of geographic diversity, provided
there is participation behind. If not, we may consider the ICANN
structure is not well adapted, and then we need to ask ourselves why.
May be there are alternate structures for wide geographic participation ?

Elisabeth Porteneuve
--

Danny wrote:
> 
> If we seek to thwart the effort to have the At-Large Board Directors reduced 
> from nine to six, we need to organize a counter proposal.  
> 
> I wish to re-propose the creation of nine geographical zones, thereby  
> honoring the White Paper committment to geographical diversity while creating 
> a means by which we can readily elect our At-large Directors.  
> 
> Those that wish to participate in this "mapping" project are requested to 
> post their preliminary recommendations to our GA-ICANN list.  As we move 
> closer to a consensus, we can bring the dialogue back onto the main GA list. 
> 
> 
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
> 
> 

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html