<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] FYI: IANA Report on .au (Australia) redelegation
You know that ICANN was granted its' position based upon the same
assumption, its' paperwork looked good. As it got into practice the
At-Large was suspended and it was determined to not follow the original
intent of the paperwork. There are many now that argue to ignore the
paperwork altogether for various reasons. I would implore all concerned
not to change a thing until there is an actually elected at large fully
operational board. Lest they go down ICANNs path.
Eric
Alexander Svensson wrote:
> IANA Report on Request for Redelegation of the .au Top-Level Domain
> http://www.iana.org/reports/au-report-31aug01.htm
>
> Excerpts:
> Upon its establishment in 1986, the .au ccTLD was delegated to Robert
> Elz, a network programmer at the University of Melbourne.
> ...
> [T]he .au Domain Administration (auDA) was formed. On 15 November
> 1999, Mr. Elz sub-delegated to auDA the authority to manage the
> .com.au namespace, which comprises approximately 85% of all domain
> names within the .au ccTLD.
> ...
> The IANA's consultations with the Australian Internet community have
> demonstrated substantial support for auDA's assumption of the role
> as manager of the .au ccTLD. In consultations with the IANA, Mr. Elz
> has acknowledged that the management of the .au ccTLD should be
> transferred to a broadly supported organization.
> ...
> Mr. Elz, however, has expressed concern that auDA is still not fully
> formed and that in practice its base of participants is not as broad
> as desirable. Melbourne IT, a major stakeholder in the Australian
> Internet community and operator of the principal registry (.com.au)
> within the .au ccTLD, also expressed concern that auDA is a new,
> untested organization that may not prove effective in broadly
> representing all parts of the Internet community. Both Mr. Elz and
> Melbourne IT suggested that the management of the .au ccTLD would
> more appropriately be performed directly by the Australian Government.
> ...
> According to the design described in its constitution, auDA is
> well-suited to be inclusive of, and accountable to, the Australian
> Internet community and to operate through open, transparent, and
> inclusive processes. Mr. Elz's and Melbourne IT's concerns appear
> to be that auDA will not develop according to this design. These
> concerns, however, are obviated by the Australian Government's
> desire to have the .au ccTLD managed by the private sector,
> combined with the Government's commitments that it will ensure
> that auDA operates in an open, transparent, inclusive, and
> representative way.
> ...
> Upon conclusion of a mutually satisfactory agreement between ICANN
> and auDA reflecting the principles set forth in clause 10 of the
> GAC principles, adjusted as necessary to suit local circumstances,
> the .au ccTLD should be redelgated to auDA.
>
> Best regards,
> /// Alexander
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|