<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re[6]: [ga] FW: Urgent: questions for ICANN Board Candidates
Saturday, Saturday, September 08, 2001, 2:28:39 AM, DPF wrote:
> Actually .uk's position seems pretty close to not recognising ICANN's
> authority at all. Their position IIRC is they have a contract with
> the estate of Jon Postel which ICANN can not terminate (DR Black
> correct me if mis-stating).
Jon Postel didn't own the namespace. The argument wouldn't hold up
even if they did try and claim it.
> .uk would be one of the last not the first to sign a contract.
> Remember ICANN are not just wanting ccTLDs to accept re-delegations
> rights but also to give unlimited policy authority to ICANN.
I've seen no such thing. I think the new .au contract will closely
resemble what they are asking for.
> ICANN
> could then start exempting words from registrations, impose the UDRP,
> levying a tax per name, imposing structural requirements for 2nd and
> 3rd level names etc etc.
Again, none of those things have been proposed. However, the
registries do play a key role in the funding of ICANN, and it is from
ICANN that their delegation flows. So I think it makes perfect sense
for their to be a per domain fee as a means of supporting ICANN, and I
think that should be negotiated as a part of the contracts.
>>> Don't think that ICANN would have a shit show in hell of surviving a
>>> war with the ccTLDs as long as the major ccTLDs had their Govt onside.
>>
>>You assume the ccTLDs would be unified, and that their governments
>>would oppose ICANN on their behalf.
> I assume the major ccTLDs would be unified and their Governments would
> back then if ICANN did what you suggested. I can not speak for the NZ
> Government (well not anymore :-) but on the knowledge I do have of our
> local scene I would say it is a near certainty for us.
> And the ccTLDs have done an amazing job of keeping unity over the last
> couple of years.
I disagree. The only thing I've seen them unify behind is this
attempt to try and gain control of the board.
Honestly, I think they see the writing on the wall, that ICANN will
start cutting deals with their governments and practically forcing
them to sign new contracts. I think this whole move may be nothing
more than an attempt by them to try and stop and/or slow that process
down.
I don't believe the ccTLDs are as unified as you think, or that their
governments are that willing to go to bat for them over ICANN. I
think ICANN will make a much more attractive ally for them.
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|