[ga] Re: Urgent: questions for ICANN Board Candidates

["Paul Cotton" <paulc@joinin.com>]

Hi William,

So in essence you think the UK government would support an ICANN move to
force acceptance of their terms on the .uk operator and if Nominet won't
accept ICANN's terms to forcefully redelegate and have Nominet hand over its
nameserver and whois databases?

----- Original Message -----
From: "William X Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>

This presumes that in a redelegation registrants lose their domain
name.

That is not the case, it never has been.

The .au name holders are not in danger of losing their registrations
simple because the domain has been forcefully redelegated, just as one
example.

Everyone would still resolve their names, the suggestion that they
would somehow not be able to access things like their bank account is
nothing but informed argument, or at worst and attempt to use alarmist
rhetoric to prevent people from seeing that it really is this simple.
--- end ---


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html