Re: [ga] Urgent: questions for ICANN Board Candidates

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Dear Patrick,
It seems that the way you set-up my mailing list to get access to your 
sub-list has removed my from the ga-full. I observe that the last mail I 
received from Jeff Williams is of August 28th.
Could you please help that corrected.

Dear Leah,
I don't really understand why you dispute the peole supporting you. That 
ICANN does not respect the RFC is not a point agsint the RFC but against 
the ICANN. The policy of the ICANN is established in the ICP-1 document. 
This document is fully based upon the RFCs and does not bring anything new.

Jefsey

On 05:16 09/09/01, L Gallegos said:


>On 8 Sep 2001, at 21:43, Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> > Leah and all assembly members,
> >
> > L Gallegos wrote:
> >
> > > On 9 Sep 2001, at 1:37, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 23:45 08/09/01, William X Walsh said:
> > > > >In my opinion, no registry should ever cease to exist.
> > > >
> > > > ICANN decided otherwise. .biz registry from ARNI should have been
> > > > included in the NeuLevel registry. The current practice of the
> > > > ICANN is in violation of RFC 920/1591. Jefsey
> > > >
> > >
> > > The original .BIZ has not ceased to exist, Jefsey.  It has simply
> > > been duplicated with a collider that will result in dupliate domain
> > > names.  But you are correct, it is in violation of the RFC's if you
> > > wish to use informiational RFC's as law.
> >
> >   RFC's are not law, nor are they standards.  One would be pressed to
> > say that RFC's represent a "Beat Practices" documents either. Yet the
> > ICANN BoD and staff have publicly stated that the IETF and the RFC's
> > of which they are in part responsible for, are to be followed.  It
> > seems obvious than that the ICANN BoD and staff seem ot only wish to
> > follow those RFC's in a very selective manner.  We find that practice
> > to be both inconsistent, as well as disingenuous.
> >
> > >
>
>I guess my point is, Jeff, that if an organization adopts an RFC or
>set of them as policy, then they should follow them. ICANN doesn't
>even follow its own bylaws or MOU.  Even at that, practices over
>the last several years have pretty much made many areas of those
>RFCs obsolete.  They simply change them to suit their desires.
>How many bylaws changes have occurred since July?  Nine?
>
>Leah
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html