RE: [ga] Re: Motion for new moderators and some leadership from th e Chair

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

|> From: William X Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
|> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 9:49 AM
|> 
|> Monday, Monday, August 27, 2001, 9:44:55 AM, Roeland Meyer wrote:

|> > As things are finally settling down to getting some work 
|> done, I am loath to
|> > disrupt the infrastructure.
|> 
|> First of all, your subject line change is just the kind of behavior
|> that the rules prohibit.

I did not chose the subject line. It is a on-going discussion thread. Of
course, you would rather we have disorganized chaos, it would appear.

|> Secondly, moderators are not elected, they serve at the pleasure of
|> the Chair.  My comments are that Danny needs to take a more active
|> look at the effectiveness of those in that position, and make the
|> necessary changes.

One must balance cost with effectiveness.

|> As it turns out, it may be that the moderators lack the requisite
|> tools to do their job.  If that is in fact true, then it is the
|> chair's responsibility to find a way to fix that.

Why is it the chair's responsibility? More importantly, what makes you so
sure that it is fixable at this time? What makes you think that such effort
is cost/effective?  Sometimes, we have to live with "good enough".
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html