Re: [ga] We can't be against it?

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Dave and all assembly members,

  One thing is clear, that is that the DNSO GA was not consulted
directly.  And as far as I know, neither was the NCDNHC (Noncom).
And certainly the At-Large was not consulted.  So I would have to
gander a educated guess that this was strictly a ICANN BoD and
staff decision alone.

  I am very disappointed in this sort of "Fear Mongering" in the face
of adversity.  To me anyway it shows a certain lack of integrity
and displays some cowardice in the face of terrorism.
That's utterly disgusting!!  :((

DPF wrote:

> On Thu, 27 Sep 2001 23:16:10 +0200 (CEST), Marc Schneiders
> <marc@venster.nl> wrote:
>
> >Yesterday ICANN announced (see www.icann.org) that the next meeting
> >in MdR (LA) will be different and mainly devoted to security issues
> >following the September 11 tragedies. Other topics on the agenda will
> >probably be postponed.
>
> What I would be very interested to know is who actually made this
> decision?  Was it a staff member?  Was it the Executive Cmte or was it
> the Full Board?  Were any SOs consulted?
>
> DPF
> --
> david@farrar.com
> ICQ 29964527
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html