Re: [ga] DNSO Review Task Force

[DPF <david@farrar.com>]

On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:54:25 +0000, "Roberto Gaetano"
<ga_list@hotmail.com> wrote:

>Appendix B
>Criteria for establishing new DNSO constituencies

Thanks for the report Roberto.  While disappointing some changes such
as GA Chair elections have not been made it is nice to now have a
clear template to measure an individual's constituency application
against.

What I propose to interested people is that we put together an
application that answers all questions posed below.  We try and gain
maximum agreement on each component and when we have a final
application we ask as many people as possible to lend their name in
support to it.

I suggest that rather than have one person go away and do a personal
draft of the whole thing we work through the 8 major chapters one by
one.  People can all contribute their own wordings and we merge
together to get the best overall result before heading onto the next
section.

It would be nice to have this done in time for Los Angeles.  Not even
necessarily to ask the Board to make a decision at that meeting but to
physically gain more signatures for the petition and lobby key people.
Then present to the Board for their consideration at the next meeting?

DPF

>
>1. Need
>1.1 What need would the proposed new constituency fill?
>1.2 What would the proposed new constituency bring to the DNSO that is now 
>lacking?
>
>2. Common interest
>2.1 What commonality of interest would the members of the proposed new 
>constituency share?
>
>3. Distinction
>3.1 How much overlap in membership is there likely to be between the 
>proposed new constituency and existing constituencies, the General Assembly 
>and other parts of ICANN?
>
>4. Representation
>4.1 How representative of the stated common interest would the proposed new 
>constituency be?
>4.2 What steps have the petitioners taken to establish a hierarchy of 
>representativeness and openness within the proposed new constituency?
>
>5. Alternatives
>5.1 Are there alternative means of fulfilling the stated need besides 
>recognition of a new constituency?
>5.2 Are there other places within the ICANN structure where this need could 
>be fulfilled?
>
>6. Organisation on a global scale
>6.1 What steps have the proponents of the proposed new constituency taken to 
>organise the proposed new constituency?
>6.2 Has the proposed new constituency demonstrated the capability to command 
>the financial and human resources required by a constituency?
>
>7. Support within the DNSO
>7.1 What steps have the proponents of the proposed new constituency taken to 
>seek support from existing constituencies?
>
>8. Impact assessment
>8.1 What would be the impact of the proposed new constituency on existing 
>constituencies?
>8.2 What would be the impact of the proposed new constituency on the 
>finances and administration of the DNSO?
>8.3 What would be the impact of the proposed new constituency on policy 
>formation within the DNSO?

--
david@farrar.com
ICQ 29964527
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html