DNSO Archives: [ga]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[2]: [ga] We can't be against it?

To: "John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <john@johnberryhill.com>
Subject: Re[2]: [ga] We can't be against it?
From: William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 17:23:07 -0700
CC: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>, "'Marc Schneiders'" <marc@venster.nl>, <ga@dnso.org>
In-Reply-To: <009801c14ad1$ad1c0700$3401010a@ddhs.com>
References: <21917FA62B667E4FBE52007E20BF174101C91BCA@lganj0se2.lga.att.com><009801c14ad1$ad1c0700$3401010a@ddhs.com>
Reply-To: William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Sender: owner-ga@dnso.org

Monday, Monday, October 01, 2001, 4:32:25 PM, John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D. wrote:

> Meanwhile, back at the ranch, ICANN firmly agrees that most of the name space
> should remain vulnerable to any registrar who decides to go nuts and submit a
> large number of falsified registrar transfer requests...

> That's real secure.

Said registrar would quickly no longer be a registrar.  Self
Preservation has made it a non-issue.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re[2]: [ga] We can't be against it?
  - From: "John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <john@johnberryhill.com>

References:
- RE: [ga] We can't be against it?
  - From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>
- Re: [ga] We can't be against it?
  - From: "John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <john@johnberryhill.com>
- Re: [ga] We can't be against it?
  - From: "John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <john@johnberryhill.com>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>