Re: [ga] Re: Memo to Stuart Lynn

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Mr. Lynn have your resigned from CEO?

Here is my second installment on your hateful political attack on my dotcommoners;

You state below "no ironclad blah blah blah"

Where most of us come from a man can give his word and not cop out on some best
efforts shenanigans.  Ya you can promise to quit if reasonable accommodation are
not met and you can set them forth, {see Lee Ioccoca and Ted Turner}

Your Corporate hide behind corporate skirt is sickening but expected.  Be a man
and do what is right or shut up and ask Vint to speak for the corp.   Remember you
are talking to members here ( which is the same as stockholders = stakeholders)
unless you want to adopt Esther and Mikes point of view.

Either you are with the GA or against it, what shall it be?

Sincerely,
Eric

"M. Stuart Lynn" wrote:

>
> Dear Danny:
>
> Thank you for your note.
>
> The operative part of the bylaws is the deadline of the 2002 Annual
> Meeting. That is operative because of the expiration of terms of current
> directors. My sense is that the Board intends to make every effort to
> meet that deadline, even if it cannot act on the ALSC report until
> Accra in March. I repeat the phrase 'every effort". Until a final
> decision, however, is made, there can be no ironclad guarantees,
> because the content of that decision is unknown. For me to say that
> no slippage will occur would be foolish -- neither I nor the Board
> have the power to make such an ironclad guarantee (regardless of what
> happens in November). Perhaps the Board may have to take some special
> action to extend the deadline a few months. I do not want that to
> happen, but it may.

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html