<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re[2]: [ga] RE: Recall of GA Chair
Thursday, Thursday, October 04, 2001, 2:08:13 PM, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, William X Walsh wrote:
>> > As I said in a previous post, my inclination, as a NC member, would be
>> > to return the request to the GA based on lack of consensus on the
>> > "motion". In fact, it is not even a motion. So far I have seen only one
>> > or two "partial agreements" to WXW suggestion.
>>
>> It is indeed sad to see a NC member not willing to step up to the
>> plate on the issue of GA leadership, and instead passing the buck back
>> to the GA. If the GA could solve the problem, it would have by now.
> I'm not certain if the complaint or one or two individuals raises this to
> the level of a "problem" of the GA.
Lack of complaint doesn't eliminate the fact that the GA has been
absolutely unproductive since this chair took office. That is the
problem.
The number of people who happen to find that to be a bad thing is
irrelevant.
--
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
Userfriendly.com Domains
The most advanced domain lookup tool on the net
DNS Services from $1.65/mo
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|