RE: Re[6]: [ga] cenam fortunae

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

|> From: William X Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
|> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 2:28 AM
|> 
|> Tuesday, Tuesday, October 09, 2001, 2:09:52 AM, Roeland Meyer wrote:
|> 
|> > If they all have the same policy-set then, to the 
|> consumer, it doesn't
|> > matter how many there are. I think that you know my 
|> standards by now
|> 
|> Yes, and you know I consider them excessive and unnecessary, and that
|> they would unnecessarily complicate the process from registry all the
|> way down to the consumer level.
|> 
|> Just because a maximum level of security protection is possible
|> doesn't mean it is necessary or desirable.

http://www.dnso.net/mhsc-tld.htm

That document spoke more towards reliability, a completely different
critter. 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html