Re: [ga] IDNO -- This affects no one.

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Hi! Bradley,
Since you are around: could you send me the info I dearly miss :-) ?

I disagree with you one a part of this point: the ICANN acts as a magnet 
for many good and interesting people (you would not be here otherwise).

The hope is that once Bill has accepted what you day, he will accept what I 
say. That is people are worth more than Joe Sims ringmarole and that we 
should proceed from our own common diversed capacities to build the real 
response.

ICANN is a necessary thing - as three registries. What is bad is that Joe 
Sims from the very begining has taken it over (they documented enough the 
way he selected the BoD Members). And that Joe Sims and Louis Touton are 
obviously brillant persons. But ICANN does not need them, at least not the 
two of them (while they obviously need the ICANN).

Jefsey

On 09:12 14/10/01, PacificRoot Hostmaster said:
>On Sat, 13 Oct 2001, William S. Lovell wrote:
>
> > I just love it when a response has nothing but cute phrases in
> > it, with no attempt whatever to address the issue. If one does
> > not agree with whatever, if one is to use up electrons one
> > might really say why, since such handwaving communicates
> > nothing to the discussion -- if any discussion was actually
> > wanted.
> >
> > Bill Lovell
> >
>
>
>Bill, You just love it when you completely miss the point? That is indeed
>a shame.
>
>Let me spell it out for you, although I thought that you got the point
>without me ever having to affirm what you said in the first place - I
>guess not, so I'll simplify:
>
>Bill, nothing you do here matters. It is wasted breath - a hobby at most.
>And any dialogue you engage in on this GA list only stands to validate the
>reason the GA was created in the first place. That reason is to provide a
>place where people can waste their efforts in an excercise of futility.
>
>Translated into cute phrases that spells: Duh!
>
>Now you understand. (I just love it when people pretend they don't
>understand the obvious).
>
>Perhaps you haven't been around long enough to glean that bit of wisdom.
>Perhaps you just seek a way to pass the time engaging in debate (that's
>cool too). Whichever the case, any effort spent here by you has affected
>absolutely nothing in ICANN - nor will it. Again, that is by design :)
>
>So... "The Issue" has now been addressed without cute phrases.
>
>--
>
>Bradley D. Thornton
>Chief Technology Officer
>The PacificRoot/Joint Technologies Ltd.
>http://www.PacificRoot.com
>http://www.JointTech.com
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html