Re: [ga] Structure Taskforce

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Eric and all assembly members,

  As this subject had it's beginnings on the GA list forum, and the fact that
the Sub-lists have been for the most part ignored or are not currently
in regular use as well as having a divisive nature amongst many of
our GA members, respectfully I must decline your invitation as stated.

  It is also not consistent with the second part of your request also
given that the precedent for THIS ASSEMBLY has been set, long
argued for, and now showing that it does, can and will be fruitful,
that as such, your second request although well meaning, is
inconsistent with current practice, out of the norm for and assembly,
cannot and does not show a reflection of the GA, and therefore
is not representative of the GA.

  I and I am sure others, appreciate your concern and interest in this
matter, and hopefully will take under your own persona council
and/or advisement to adhere to the present practice and await for
a nomination period and/or a ballot to decide the matter in a
representative manner that befits this General Assembly and
its fine members.  Thank you.

Eric Dierker wrote:

> Let us move to the sub list where we can get some work done without
> obstructionists.
>
> Jeff
> Please give us less informed than you, one single written rule that supports
> this position.  Do not bother with prior actions as this is a rule based and
> not precedent based concept as we are not in court.
>
> Jeff Williams wrote:
>
> >   We must have an election to determine whom would be the best
> > GA member to represent the GA members.
>
> This is just plain and simple wrong.  Only Jeff supports this position and
> if I am wrong it will be a small minority, maybe 3.  I do hope that someday
> we will have the funds and luxury to have elections for every assignment but
> that is a nice ideal not a requirement that can be used to block progress.
>
> Anyone who feels that other input should be exhibited here should join with
> David on the sublist and give reasonable input.  I think David should and
> will take a hard look at Roelands motion and follow from there.
>
> Sincerely,
> Eric

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html