RE: [ga] WIPO Arbitrators Stern In Domain 'Hijacking' Rulings

[Andy Gardner <andy@navigator.co.nz>]

At 4:21 PM -0700 26/10/01, Roeland Meyer wrote:
>Cute ... so what's the penalty?

Respondent gets to pick a domain name from complainant's pool.

That'd make some frivolous complainant's think twice.

Of course, the complainant would probably take it straight back via another
UDRP complaint.

>|> From: Jeff Williams [mailto:jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com]
>|> Sent: Friday, October 26, 2001 6:02 PM
>|>
>|> All assembly members,
>|>
>|>   FYI Revers-hijacking cases From WIPO...
>|> See: http://www.technews.com/news/01/171338.html
>
>--
>This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
>Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
>("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
>Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

-- 
Andrew P. Gardner
barcelona.com stolen, stmoritz.com stays. What's uniform about the UDRP?
We could ask ICANN to send WIPO a clue, but do they have any to spare?
Get active: http://www.tldlobby.com
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html