RE: Re[2]: [ga] WIPO Arbitrators Stern In Domain 'Hijacking' Rulings

["John Berryhill" <john@johnberryhill.com>]

>
> Actually, I'm with Dassa on this one. Besides, the perp would simply laugh
> at any ICANN monetary demands.

In the real world, this is why a plaintiff seeking certain kinds of
preliminary relief, such as replevin of property, must first post a bond.
It provides an automatic remedy to the defendant in the event the plaintiff
is not acting in good faith.

I'd prefer to see such a bond go to a prevailing domain name registrant,
RDNH ruling or not, since it would enable more respondents with meritorious
positions to obtain counsel.




--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html