RE: Re[4]: [ga] WIPO Arbitrators Stern In Domain 'Hijacking' Rulings

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

|> From: William X Walsh [mailto:william@userfriendly.com]
|> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 8:05 AM

|> was that the registrant should be able to say, "I don't submit to
|> arbitration on this, if you want to come after me for infringement,
|> then you must do it in a court that has jurisdiction on this matter."

I see your point and agree. However, on the political  front, almost all
defendants and every name-squatter, will opt out of the UDRP system by
default. This sits well with me, but it wont sit well with WIPO/ICANN.
Without the mandatory part of the UDRP, the UDRP becomes a piece of
tissue-paper. WIPO isn't stupid, they'll see right through that.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html