Re: [ga] Reliability of the Internet - the silent battle - part 2

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Sorry big Guy but your opinion is skewed.  Take your techno talk else where and read
what this list is for.
This ignorance is what has totally incapacitated  the GA.

OTOH wow are all these guys smart, between them they cannot agree on one single
virus, it's origin or how to prevent it.  Sorry Jeff but three or four guys arguing
about where a virus came from and the best way to prevent it's spread is a list
killer, the virus became human.  And you are becoming typhoid Mary.

Peace
Eric

Jeff Williams wrote:

> Eric and all assembly members,
>
>   Perhaps you haven't been paying close attention Eric.  So let us
> do a little review in conjunction with interspersed responses to
> your commentary.  (See more below)
>
> Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > Could someone relate why this is relevant to this list.
>
>   Yes.  So more below
>
> >
> >
> > DOMAIN NAME SUPPORT ORGANIZATION
> >
> > Look at the charters and at the NC papers and the GA formation docs.
> >
> > We are here to deal with issues of domain names.
>
>   Indeed we do.  But also the DNS in general as well.  As such
> virus concerns with posts to this forum are VERY relevant to
> it's participants as well as viruses that effect the DNS and Root server
> structure(s).
>
> >
> >
> > We are not here to talk about how each one of you is better at virus
> > protection than the other.
>
>   If in doing so provides additional information regarding name server,
> root server, and overall DNS security specific to viruses we need
> and should be discussing it.  If you do not understand the lingo, than
> perhaps you need to bone up.
>
> >
> >
> > Do any of you have a dotBIZ or a dotINFO or dotUS that resolves correctly and
> > is not misleading servers?
>
>   Many of us do of course.  But some viruses can effect and has effected
> the resolution of those domain names.
>
> >
> >
> > UDRP that is DNSO - GA related.
> >
> > How we are represented for DNSO purposes is related.
> >
> > Your technical analysis of how each of you can better deal and phrase virus
> > problems is not related.
>
>   Untrue.  It is quite importantly related to DNS and Domain Name
> issues.  In fact it is an issue in and of itself.
>
> >
> >
> > If you pull a "it's the security of the net gig" forget about it.
>
>   Forget about what?  Please try to be more specific Eric.
>
> >
> >
> > Anyone can go and watch participation on this list and see when technical
> > chatter like this comes up it hurts particpation, as opposed to flame wars on
> > personality helping participation.
>
>   I haven't noticed it.  In fact the contrary seems to be more accurate.
>
> >  Certainly there is a middle ground and this
> > is not it.
>
>   Perhaps and than again perhaps not.  If you have issues that you feel are
> more interesting ot others of this forum, please initiate a thread/topic/subject
> line for them.
>
> >
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > --
> > This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> > Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> > ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> > Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
>
> Regards,
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 118k members strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number:  972-447-1800 x1894 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html