<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Just a Discussion List?
Patrick and all assembly members,
I respectfully disagree with a few of your assessments below.
(See below)
Patrick Corliss wrote:
> Hi Joop
>
> > Moderation of this list is, alas, no longer taking place, for reasons that
> > Kristy has outlined so well.
> > This *needs* to be addressed.
>
> I propose a motion (which will be ignored like my last one) that:
>
> Whereas the GA is a farce,
No it is not really. I has been made many times to be disjointed
however.
>
> Whereas there is no Alternate Chair,ntil the next schedu
You resigned due to poor health as I recall. We the assembly members
decided an Alt chair is not needed until the next scheduled.
>
> Whereas there is no funding to attend ICANN meetings,
Eric Dierker took on that responsibility and tried to pass it on to me.
I declined. He than said that Peter Denge-Thrush was taking over that
function. We are awaiting Eric's and Peters progress report as Eric
promised.
>
> Whereas motions are ignored by the Chair,
Three motions have been voted upon. They have been passed onto the
NC. They should be than passed onto the ICANN BoD.
>
> Whereas there is no proper voting system,
Yes there is. It need improvement but it exists and has worked
fairly well.
>
> Wheras List Monitoring is nonexistent,
Yes it does. It is in place and working pretty well. They should not
be overbearing however.
>
> Whereas the Sub Lists are neither used or useful,
True.
>
> Whereas the Chair has cut short agendas,
True
>
> Whereas the NC has lost the plot,
True
>
> Whereas there is no democracy in the ICANN Board,
True
>
> Whereas ICANN itself is captured by vested interests,
True for the most part.
>
> Whereas there is no possible way of achieving consensus,
Not true. There are a number of possible ways of achieving
consensus. However the ICANN BoD and staff as well as the
NC are not willing to do so by vote.
>
> Whereas the DNSO Secretariat ignores the GA,
Not always. But this does seem to be a problem from time to time.
The DNSO GA needs a full time paid Secretariat.
>
> Wheras there is no system for proper procedures in the GA,
Yes there is. And it works but not all that well. The List illegitimate
list rules need modifying.
>
>
> THAT the GA declare that it is just a DNS discussion list.
No, that would be a very bad idea. It is an assembly. Perhaps
you are not all that familiar with how and assembly often operates?
>
>
> Best regards
> Patrick Corliss
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|