RE: [ga] Mr. Qaddafi Salutes Verisign

[Joseph <fhlee@tm.net.my>]

Hi Dr. John Berryhill,

I'm afraid I do not know enough nor have enough history of subject to answer
these questions.
From a layman position, I think ICANN should be more international than what
it is currently legally binded to.

>>> Then would you agree to reversing the result of every UDRP decision
where a non-US registrant was found to have engaged in cybersquatting on the
basis of a US trademark?
*** My personal position is the rights of individuals. But that is a
different story. Suffice to say that I feel that there are room for
improvements in the current UDRP.

>>> It would seem to be a relative no-brainer that if ICANN is going to
engage itself in establishing a policy relating to aspects of national civil
law, then ICANN should CERTAINLY have a higher priority for establishing a
policy relating to the CRIMINAL law of the United States.
*** From a legal aspect this is true.

regards,
- Joseph
==============

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html