Re: [ga] Business Constituency and the GA

[Eric Dierker <eric@hi-tek.com>]

Nah,

Peter and all ccTLD managers.  get out while you can.  Including dotUS and neulevel.

You guys are in the best position to represent the countries and the local users.
ICANN has no business telling countries how to manage their domain names.

Eric

William X Walsh wrote:

> Wednesday, Wednesday, November 21, 2001, 1:56:36 PM, Peter Dengate Thrush wrote:
>
> > That is why, incidentally, the DNSO needs to remain as it is, as the
> > debating chamber for the development of consensus policies affecting the
> > g-TLDs,
>
> That is not what it is, nor is it what it should be or become.
>
> There is no special status for the ccTLDs that warrant them having
> their own SO.  None.
>
> The ccTLD CONSTITUENCY bears the brunt of the responsibility for
> non-addressing of ccTLD issues in the DNSO.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
> --
> Webcertificates.info
> SSL Certificates for resellers from $49ea
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga-full@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga-full" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html