Re[4]: [ga] Business Constituency and the GA

[William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>]

Wednesday, Wednesday, November 21, 2001, 4:01:37 PM, Roeland Meyer wrote:

|>> From: William X Walsh [mailto:william@wxsoft.info]
|>> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 2:12 PM
|>> 
|>> Wednesday, Wednesday, November 21, 2001, 1:56:36 PM, Peter 
|>> Dengate Thrush wrote:
|>> 
|>> > That is why, incidentally, the DNSO needs to remain as it 
|>> is, as the
|>> > debating chamber for the development of consensus policies 
|>> affecting the
|>> > g-TLDs,
|>> 
|>> That is not what it is, nor is it what it should be or become.
|>> 
|>> There is no special status for the ccTLDs that warrant them having
|>> their own SO.  None.

> That's not the song that I recall you singing a few years back. Am I wrong?

You're wrong.

I firmly believe the ccTLDs belong in the DNSO.

I also firmly believe that the ccTLDs are not, and should not be
assumed to be, under the control of the governments of the countries
the ccTLD codes represent.

Perhaps that is what you are thinking of.  The two positions are not
mutually exclusive.

-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Webcertificates.info
SSL Certificates for resellers from $49ea

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html