<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ga] Business Constituency and the GA
At 10:56 22/11/01 +1300, Peter Dengate Thrush wrote:
>In my country, the registry is contractually bound by policies developed by
>the consensus processes adopted by InternetNZ.
Which means in practice that registrar-registrant contracts are no longer
unilaterally written by the registrars or by the registry.
>That is why, incidentally, the DNSO needs to remain as it is, as the
>debating chamber for the development of consensus policies affecting the
>g-TLDs, including those interested in and affected by gTLD policies, while
>the ccSO* is the forum for developing both the binding and the voluntary
>policies across the ccTLds.
Agreed.
With the addition, of course, that new constituencies such as the
Individual DN Holder constituency and (now necessitated by the purge within
the BC) a SME constituency can enter the DNSO to take part in these debates
and in any policy proposals that are sent up to the Board.
Joop Teernstra LL.M.
Councillor
InternetNZ
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|