RE: Re[4]: [ga] Business Constituency and the GA

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

|> From: William X Walsh [mailto:william@wxsoft.info]
|> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 4:29 PM
|> 
|> Wednesday, Wednesday, November 21, 2001, 4:01:37 PM, Roeland 
|> Meyer wrote:

|> > That's not the song that I recall you singing a few years 
|> back. Am I wrong?
|> 
|> You're wrong.
|> 
|> I firmly believe the ccTLDs belong in the DNSO.

Were the ICANN anything other than dysfunctional, I might agree with you.

|> I also firmly believe that the ccTLDs are not, and should not be
|> assumed to be, under the control of the governments of the countries
|> the ccTLD codes represent.
|> 
|> Perhaps that is what you are thinking of.  The two positions are not
|> mutually exclusive.

Yes, that is what I was thinking of. I might point out that Jon Postel used
ccTLD delegations as alliance building currency (a matter of record). Some
of those ccTLDs have been reclaimed by their rightful owners, over the past
four years. Even it is is actually run by an outside management company, the
ccTLD still belongs to its country. It isn't a gTLD.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html