ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[2]: [ga] Re: DNSO Constituency Structure


On 18:34 22/11/01 -0800, William X Walsh said:


>My last motion in the IDNO was an
>attempt to bridge the gap between the two factions, and it lost by ONE
>SINGLE VOTE.  Joop makes it sound like those who oppose his elitist
>view of the IDNO and how it should be run and what it should be doing
>are only one or two vocal people, whom he slanders and tries to
>discredit.  THE FACTS ARE VERY DIFFERENT.

The facts about that vote are here: www.idno.org/democinaction.htm
Let the reader judge for himself what the truth is.
That WXW is even less restrained on the idno-discuss list than he is here 
only confirms that he's a royal pain  to any constituency that would 
harbour him. :-(


--Joop

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>