Re: [ga] Consensus development process

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Danny and all assembly members,

DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:

> Chuck Gomes writes that "no valid consensus development process has ever been
> put into place."  I find this comment somewhat troubling at a time when the
> Names Council has established a Task Force charged with arriving at a binding
> consensus policy regarding the issue of transfers.

  The problem is that the Task FOrce to which you reference was not an
open process for any and all stakeholders or interested parties to
openly participate in.  As such it's findings are tainted if not illegitimate.


>
>
> The last thing that any registrant wants is to have a disgruntled set of
> registrars challenge a consensus determination on this matter and further
> delay efforts at resolution of an ongoing problem.  If Chuck has legitimate
> concerns regarding the consensus development process, now would be the time
> to air those specific concerns so that we can move forward properly and
> finally put this issue behind us.
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html