RE: [ga] Consensus development process

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

|> From: Marc Schneiders [mailto:marc@fuchsia.bijt.net]
|> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 1:26 AM
|> 
|> On Sat, 24 Nov 2001, at 23:51 [=GMT-0500], DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
|> 
|> > Chuck Gomes writes that "no valid consensus development 
|> process has ever been
|> > put into place."  I find this comment somewhat troubling 
|> at a time [...]
|> 
|> I find this comment troubling in itself. It shows how sick 
|> ICANN is. That
|> is more important than all the transfers between registrars 
|> about which
|> you worry.

I agree.

|> Why don't we try to take the comment seriously? And do 
|> something about it.
|> The "ICANN community" I mean.

Because we can't? It is clear to me now that, with the current BoD, the
ICANN cannot be fixed. Rather, that it should be "fixed" instead. Calling an
act of tyranny a consensus, in a body that is consensus based, is probably
more accurately called an act of corruption. That corruption i sufficiently
infused thorughout the ICANN that it can't effectivly be extracted. The
cancer has eaten too deep. Actually, the poor thing was born with it.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html