RE: [ga] RE: DNSO Constituency Structure

[Roeland Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

|> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
|> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 11:44 AM

|> Don't confuse the development of consensus policy with "truth" or
|> "unanimity". What I find intriguing is that what you hold up 
|> as failures of
|> the process, I look to as successes of the process. Context, 
|> condition and
|> perspective all lend to that difference, but regardless, 
|> ICANN is hardly the
|> drastic failure that some might have one believe.

Actually, and as the number if disenfranchised internet entities can atest,
the failure is quite as drastic, if not more so, as is being suggested.

There is lots of claimed consensus, absent any sort of evidence whatsoever.
Even from among those that are included in the power clique. When it comes
from outside of that clique, no one even bothers to ask. In fact, they don't
want to know.

I'm about to come to the conclusion that it is about time to put an end to
the High Schoolish club that we call the ICANN.
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html