Re: [ga] RE: DNSO Constituency Structure

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

> One might argue that since Tucows has directly benefited from the actions
> of ICANN the same could be said of your comments.

heh. Nice twist.

Let me get this straight. I request fair and accurate commentary and the
next thing I know I'm the self-serving and inaccurate one in this
discussion. hrm. You might want to consider the difference between being
self-serving and being self-interested. The by-laws touch on one and not the
other.

Try and keep your rhetoric in your back-pocket and stick to the issues.

-rwr

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html