RE: [ga] DNSO Constituency Structure

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DPF [mailto:david@farrar.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 4:56 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: [ga]
> Subject: Re: [ga] DNSO Constituency Structure
> 
> 
(Text deleted)
> 
> What is wrong with doing what basically happened to the other seven
> constituencies.  Approve the concept in principle and then you will
> find members and structure will come easily.  Also one could assert
> that as a constituency can change its charter at will from that
> initially approved why worry about what is there at the moment of
> application as it could change the next day?
> 
Personally I would find nothing wrong with that approach; I just think that
it is extremely unlikely to happen.  The choices then are to sit around and
wait and complain that nothing happens or do something that might increase
the chances significantly.  A third alternative is to support the ALSC
recommendations for an At-Large SO that could possibly meet many of the
needs that an individuals' constituency might meet.

Chuck

(Text deleted)
> 
> DPF
> --
> david@farrar.com
> ICQ 29964527
> 
--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html