Re: [ga] Being Accountable, Philip, Means Answering Questions

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Patrick and all assembly members,

  Although this is a scathing review of the TF's and WG's much of it
rings unfortunately true of very close to it.  This is why I have been
so insistent that any and all TF's and WG's be open to any and
all willing and interested GA or other participants, instead of
"Closed" lists.

Patrick Corliss wrote:

> On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 05:10:39 +1100, Patrick Corliss wrote:
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc06/msg00430.html
>
> > Meanwhile, for the sake of clarification, could you advise whether the
> number
> > of task forces is limited to the seven currently in train or have others
> been
> > proposed ?  How will the Names Council select GA representation in the
> absence
> > of a formal nomination?
> >
> > As I have been unable to establish the Terms of Reference for all seven task
> > forces, would you be so kind as to advise exactly what is being proposed in
> > each case?
> >
> > Could you also advise who is authorised to post to the Names Council mailing
> > list?  Do I, for example, still retain posting rights as the former
> Alternate
> > Chair?
>
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:07:39 +0100, Philip Sheppard replied:
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/council/Arc06/msg00435.html
>
> > thank you for your numerous questions.
> >
> > Please see my reply today on the TF transfers issue.
> >
> > Details of NC TF and participants can be found in the DNSO archives.
>
> Hi Philip
>
> At least some of the questions were quite simple and such that you could have
> answered from the top of your head.  The first, for example, simply asked how
> many task forces are planned?  The last was asking who had posting rights to
> the Names Council mailing list?
>
> You have clearly made no effort to be of even minimal assistance.
>
> The meaty question related to the Terms of Reference for the Names Council
> Task Forces.  You have said to see the "DNSO archives".
>
> Of course, you are quite well aware that there are seven Task Forces each with
> their own mailing list.  I have read every email on all seven mailing lists.
> I have also read through the NC and GA mailing lists.  In fact, I have pointed
> out exactly which Task Force Terms of Reference I have been able to locate.
> On the GA mailing list, I wrote:
>
> > Please also note that I have been only been able to identify a Terms of
> Reference
> > in three out of seven instances.
>
> http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc08/msg03038.html
>
> Now I have found that none of our representatives are in the least bit
> accountable for their actions.  Very few deign to answer questions of any
> sort.
>
> And when they do they fudge the answers, lie and prevaricate.  You more than
> most.
>
> The sad fact is, Philip, that the Task Forces are a con designed to avoid
> consensus and fast track the process in an underhanded and dishonest way.
>
> Which is exactly what you are trying to cover up.
>
> Patrick Corliss
>
> --
> This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
> Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
> ("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
> Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 121k members/stakeholdes strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208


--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html