ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[ga]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re[2]: [ga] The Network Solutions contribution to international terror


Monday, Monday, December 03, 2001, 2:12:53 AM, Joanna Lane wrote:

> on 12/2/01 10:23 PM, Patrick Corliss at patrick@quad.net.au wrote:

>> On Sun, 2 Dec 2001 16:06:54 -0800, William X Walsh wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> Sunday, Sunday, December 02, 2001, 3:55:39 PM, William S. Lovell wrote:
>>>> But in any case, as internet inept as I may be, the question
>>>> remains, has Network Solutions accepted money for which
>>>> it provides a service to Hamas

> Yes.

Again, you jump to an assumption, and place a label on Network
Solutions for which you have nothing but the most flimsy proof.

Some would call that libelous.

>> <snip>
>> 
>>> In other words, you are making many assumptions, that are best left to
>>> law enforcement officials who have the tools to see if in fact that is
>>> the case.

> There's nothing obvious about this?

> <quote>

No, there isn't.

>>> I'm of the opinion it would most likely turn out not to be the case.

> Then VRSN/ NetSol must have donated www.palestine-info.com to Hamas.

No, and again, you are jumping to conclusions based on the most flimsy
of evidence.

>>> We have many loons in this country who would get their sick thrills by
>>> putting up sites like that one.

> Yes, they're called Internet Service Providers.

Your contributions have really gone down hill lately, Joanna.  This is
just further evidence of it.

Perhaps it is time for you to take a break.

> <snip>
>> I have never agreed with you more, William, than I do now.
>> 
>> If I am not mistaken Joanna Lane has already brought this to our attention.

> Not me. John Berryhill is the expert. I questioned Stuart Lynn, who
> responded that ICANN doesn't care who its Registrars sells Domain Names to.
> See www.IcannWatch.org "Stuart Lynn tackles Home Defense".

ICANN shouldn't care.  It is not their role or position.

It is up to the REGISTRARS to comply with the law.

> Question: If it is illegal for ATT & BT to provide Al Barakat with internet
> connectivity, why is it legal for Network Solutions to sell them Domain
> names?

No one is saying it is legal.  But also, no one has proof that they
have.


-- 
Best regards,
William X Walsh <william@wxsoft.info>
--
Webcertificates.info
SSL Certificates for resellers from $49ea

--
This message was passed to you via the ga@dnso.org list.
Send mail to majordomo@dnso.org to unsubscribe
("unsubscribe ga" in the body of the message).
Archives at http://www.dnso.org/archives.html



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>